Skip to content

Radioactive Foods and Their Safe Levels of Radiation Exposure

Radioactive shrimp, earlier deemed unsafe due to potential contamination with cesium-137 (Cs-137), undergo a product recall. The intensity of radioactivity isn't a binary matter, hence concerns about varying levels of contamination persist.

Radioactive Food and Safe Levels of Food Radiation
Radioactive Food and Safe Levels of Food Radiation

Radioactive Foods and Their Safe Levels of Radiation Exposure

In an interesting turn of events, a recent study by the American Nuclear Society (ANS) suggests that the contaminated shrimp incident resembles the radiation levels found in bananas, specifically with regards to Cesium-137 (Cs-137) levels.

The radiation level from Potassium-40 (K-40), a natural isotope, is present in significant amounts daily, regardless of whether one is a crustacean, plant, or mammal. Interestingly, the radiation level from K-40 in bananas and the 'radioactive shrimp' has been found to be comparable.

Despite this, the measured level of Cs-137 in the contaminated batches of shrimp was below 68 Bq/kg, while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limit is 1,200 Bq/kg. This finding is further supported by the FDA's report, which indicates that the contamination of the recalled 'radioactive shrimp' with Cs-137 was far below the legal threshold.

The FDA's Derived Intervention Levels (DILs) for Sr-90, Iodine-131, Cs-134, and Cs-137 are all set at 1,200 Bq/kg, while for Strontium-90 (Sr-90), the limit is 160 Bq/kg. It's worth noting that Sr-90, with a 29-year half life, poses a particular risk due to its bioaccumulating nature.

Government regulations pertaining to radiation exposure are most often based on the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, which extrapolates down from high radiation doses where damage is more easily measurable. However, recent studies have suggested that below 100 mSv, there are no observable effects, implying that a model that incorporates a threshold might be more appropriate for radiological contamination of food.

Interestingly, K-40, both a beta and gamma emitter, is responsible for an approximate constant 4,000 Bq of radiation in a 70 kg adult human body. In contrast, Cs-137's 30 year half-life and primary gamma decay route make it significantly more radiologically active.

It's important to note that the FDA's DILs do not include potassium-40 (K-40), a common natural isotope and the third-largest source of natural background radiation. This highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to understanding and regulating radiation levels in food.

The Pacific Ocean area, a site of numerous nuclear weapons tests, including the 15 megaton Castle Bravo experiment featuring the SHRIMP device, has been a source of concern in terms of radioactive contamination of seafood. A 2023 study found that some muscle tissue of animal products in Poland had Cs-137 levels above the typical value for Indonesian shrimp, further emphasizing the global reach of radioactive contamination.

Establishing the exact value for the threshold below which there are no increased risks is difficult due to a lack of significant epidemiological data. The National Academy of Science report from 2005, on which most US regulations are based, initially rejected the threshold model due to insufficient evidence.

In conclusion, while the 'radioactive shrimp' incident has raised concerns, it's important to remember that radiation is a natural part of our environment and that our daily intake of Potassium-40, a significant source of natural background radiation, is comparable to that found in bananas and shrimp. However, the FDA's regulations and Derived Intervention Levels (DILs) serve to protect consumers from excessive radiation exposure.

Read also:

Latest