Skip to content

McWilliams, the trustee for Synapse, reveals an $85 million disparity in the frozen assets.

Fintech intermediary's partner banks maintain approximately $180 million in demand deposits and for-benefit-of accounts tied to end-users. However, the filing reveals that these users are due a total of $265 million, displaying a significant deficit.

Trustee McWilliams Discovers a Shortfall of $85 Million in Immobilized Finances
Trustee McWilliams Discovers a Shortfall of $85 Million in Immobilized Finances

McWilliams, the trustee for Synapse, reveals an $85 million disparity in the frozen assets.

Synapse, a digital banking platform, filed for bankruptcy in late April, leaving a shortfall of over $265 million owed to its customers. The source of this shortfall remains unknown.

In the wake of the bankruptcy, around 85,000 customers of the fintech Yotta reported being locked out of their accounts as of late May. Access to funds has resumed for some demand deposit account customers, but a full reconciliation may take weeks for customers whose money is pooled in for-benefit-of accounts.

Jelena McWilliams, former Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chair and Synapse's trustee, has recommended partial payments for all for-benefit-of customers to alleviate the effects on end users. However, a comprehensive search for the money trail would be complicated due to lack of funds and remaining Synapse employees.

Potential options typically available to partner banks and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court when facing a significant shortfall owed to customers like the $85 million in Synapse’s case include:

  1. Partner Banks providing liquidity support or compensation: Partner banks might inject funds to cover customer losses partially or fully to maintain trust and preserve banking relationships.
  2. Court-supervised restructuring or repayment plans: The U.S. Bankruptcy Court can approve repayment schemes that prioritize customer claims and establish how losses are distributed over time.
  3. Asset liquidation: The court or trustees may liquidate Synapse’s remaining assets to pay toward the shortfall.
  4. Customer claim prioritization and settlement negotiations: The court and banks may negotiate claim settlements prioritizing insured or high-priority customers.
  5. Seek third-party financing or insurance proceeds: Any available financial protections such as insurance claims or external financing might be tapped.

However, no specific details on these options for Synapse’s case were found in the search results. For authoritative, case-specific options, official court filings or statements from Synapse and its partner banks should be consulted.

It's worth noting that more than 100,000 customers have been locked out of accounts with banks that partner with Synapse. The money movement platform TabaPay terminated the deal with Synapse less than three weeks after it was inked.

As the situation unfolds, it's crucial for customers to stay informed and seek updates from official sources. McWilliams did not respond to requests for comment from the network. More information about Synapse's brokerage and lending business is needed to understand the flow of funds. It's also possible that Synapse commingled funds, using multiple banks to serve some companies. No information about external forensics firms being hired for the search was provided.

Read also:

Latest

New Technology Hub Emerges on Previous IKEA Location in Kaarst

Industrial development in Kaarst at the former IKEA location

Operations of high-tech firm 'AES Motomation' commenced at the old Ikea site located at Duessoestraße 8, on June 16th. The company's grand entrance was marked by a celebration that drew 120 attendees from Taiwan, America, and Japan. The event featured a vibrant and extensive program for the...