Skip to content

In the era of artificial intelligence, the role of governmental authority remains paramount, as stressed by the presidents of Finland and Latvia.

In the realm of artificial intelligence, it's crucial for governments to uphold their authority, while smaller nations should aim to find specific areas and collaborate... (RIGA - Governments needing to keep control in AI era, smaller countries aiming for niches and collaborations...)

In the era of artificial intelligence, both Finland and Latvia's presidents underscore the...
In the era of artificial intelligence, both Finland and Latvia's presidents underscore the significance of governments preserving their authority.

In the era of artificial intelligence, the role of governmental authority remains paramount, as stressed by the presidents of Finland and Latvia.

In a thought-provoking discussion at Riga Stradins University, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Latvian President Edgars Rinkevics delved into the far-reaching implications of artificial intelligence (AI) on various aspects of society.

President Stubb, in his opening remarks, highlighted the diverse models of data governance that exist globally, including the Chinese state-centric model, the American model centred around individual consent, and the European model, which prioritises privacy. He suggested that the future balance of these models among China, the USA, and Europe will lead to a more multipolar and diversified global digital landscape.

Meanwhile, President Rinkevics advocated for a niche approach for small countries, emphasising the advantages of small languages in AI use for training, translation, dissemination of information, and closer cooperation in the Nordic-Baltic (NB8) format. He also acknowledged the challenges posed by AI, particularly in defence, citing examples such as Ukrainian drones and anti-missile systems, and urged democracies to use AI also to protect their institutions.

The presidents also addressed the issue of AI regulation. President Rinkevics questioned whether governments would retain the ability to regulate effectively in the face of AI agency, while Janis Sarts, Director of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence, raised concerns about small, agile countries becoming the "other object" in the AI race.

Addressing these concerns, President Stubb argued that democracies have a self-correcting mechanism, allowing them to admit mistakes and change course, while authoritarian systems cannot do this because they stifle criticism. He concluded the discussion by urging not to look to the past but to invest in future technologies and infrastructure, stressing that governments should use AI as a tool rather than renounce responsibility for decisions.

President Rinkevics also warned of the risks of AI misuse, including in election campaigns, and called on democracies to use AI also to protect their institutions. He emphasised the importance of both skills and investment in AI, stating that investing more in AI leads to the development of human skills as well.

The discussion on AI's impact on warfare, economy, politics, and science serves as a timely reminder of the need for careful consideration and strategic planning in the face of this transformative technology. As the world continues to grapple with the implications of AI, discussions like these are crucial in shaping the future of our digital landscape.

Read also:

Latest