Skip to content
Technology — Field of view — Planetary — Reviews — Science — Collimation — Telescopes — Optics — Manual — Beginner

Evaluating and Assessing the Performance of Telescopes: The Methodology Used

It's more advantageous to rate distinct attributes of a telescope independently, rather than offering a general five-star verdict. Additionally, this approach allows for a more nuanced evaluation of the various elements that make up a telescope.

,   and  Administrator
4 min read
Instead of assigning a single overall five-star rating, it's more beneficial to rate various...
Instead of assigning a single overall five-star rating, it's more beneficial to rate various aspects of a telescope individually. Additionally, due to the diverse features of telescopes, separate ratings allow for a more comprehensive evaluation.

Evaluating and Assessing the Performance of Telescopes: The Methodology Used

A Frank Assessment:

When evaluating telescopes, a more detailed approach is preferable over a simple overall rating. Each aspect of a telescope deserves its own score, making it easier for users to grasp the strengths and weaknesses of a particular model. Here's what we grade in our no-nonsense reviews:

An Honest Assessment of our Site's Telescope Scoring System

Our rating system is strongly influenced by the opinions of our team, led by the objective Zane Landers, and the high standards we hold ourselves to. Don't be surprised if a telescope rated 3.5 by us scores a solid 4.5 for YOUR specific use. We're not claiming to have a foolproof system that suits everyone, but we can assure you that no brand has manipulated our ratings.

We provide a comprehensive out-of-five-star rating for the telescope as a whole, as well as individual ratings for each crucial component. Disregard our assessment as a general guideline and instead focus on the specific product reviews to maintain the telescope's utility for YOU. We use our expertise, experience, and rigorous testing to deliver unbiased appraisals and ratings on the telescopes we review.

In addition to the overall rating, we also score the following components separately:

  • Optics: The telescope's lens and mirror quality, ensuring consistency.
  • Focuser: How well the focusing mechanism functions.
  • Mount (or Tripod): Depending on whether the telescope is manual or computerized, we rate its sturdiness and smoothness/accuracy.
  • Lunar & Planetary Views: Assessing the telescope's ability to observe the moon and planets.
  • Rich Field Views (Wide-Field Deep Sky Objects): Assessing the telescope's performance at low magnification for viewing deep-sky objects.
  • Accessories: Evaluating the quality and adequateness of the telescope's accessories.
  • Ease of Use: Determining how simple this telescope is to set up and operate.
  • Portability: Evaluating the telescope's suitability for travel and transport requirements.
  • Value: Analyzing whether the telescope offers a good deal for the money and comparing it to similar alternatives.

Telescopes without mounts will not receive a 1 for the mount; instead, the mount score will simply not be considered in the final tally. Telescope optical tubes sold without accessories will be evaluated in the same manner.

A more detailed explanation of our criteria:

Optics

Quality can be difficult for beginners to assess, so we've done the hard part for you by thoroughly testing the telescopes we assess.

  • 1 star: Worthless optics, providing worse views than the unaided eye at any magnification.
  • 2 stars: Subpar optics, fuzzy but somewhat enjoyable when observing the Moon and deep-sky objects at low power.
  • 3 stars: Serviceable optics, but not perfect, good up to 1x-1.5x per mm of aperture.
  • 4 stars: A typical "good" commercial telescope, not perfect but at least functional and hard to notice any flaws at first glance.
  • 5 stars: Optical excellence, indistinguishable from perfect optics in most cases. Rare in commercial offerings.

Focuser

  • 1 star: Probably entirely plastic, noticeably wobbles when focusing, seriously affects collimation, struggles to hold heavy eyepieces, and maintains focus inconsistently.
  • 2 stars: Wobbly due to poor construction or difficulty focusing, but still functional and holds focus okay, without causing too much trouble with collimation.
  • 3 stars: Acceptable focusing mechanism, but with some minor flaws, such as difficulty focusing precisely or struggling to hold heavy eyepieces.
  • 4 stars: Entirely metallic, does not impact collimation at all, and is fairly easy to focus while maintaining consistent focus with heavy eyepieces or accessories.
  • 5 stars: Smooth motion, reliable dual-speed adjustment, usually featuring a focus lock, entirely metallic, and maintains focus even with heavy eyepieces or accessories.

Mount

  • 1 star: Useless mount; aiming is exasperating. Cannot reliably aim at targets, shaky and unbalanced, or overly heavy, preventing accurate aim at deep-sky targets.
  • 2 stars: Mount is either shaky, unbalanced, or difficult to aim, but can still be used with effort. Manages to hold the telescope well enough to see something, albeit with numerous frustrations.
  • 3 stars: The mount is functional but suboptimal and/or undersized.
  • 4 stars: Stable, sturdy, reasonably balanced, and easy enough to use, but with some design imperfections that occasionally add complexity. Distinguishable vibrations when focusing occasionally arise. If GoTo (automated), it's serviceable but not very accurate.
  • 5 stars: Well-constructed mount, completely supports the telescope, and moves smoothly, minimizing vibrations when focusing. If GoTo, the mount accurately slews and tracks targets.
  1. The comprehensive rating system used in our reviews is based on the opinions of our team, led by Zane Landers, and is designed to help users understand a telescope's strengths and weaknesses.
  2. Optics, the quality of a telescope's lens and mirror, receive a rating from 1 to 5 stars in our reviews, with 5 stars indicating optical excellence and 1 star denoting subpar optics offering worse views than the unaided eye.
  3. The focusing mechanism of a telescope, or focuser, is another key component that we rate based on smoothness, accuracy, and ability to hold heavy eyepieces, with a 5-star rating indicating a focus mechanism that offers smooth motion, reliable dual-speed adjustment, a focus lock, and maintains focus even with heavy eyepieces or accessories.
  4. In our reviews, we also assess the mount or tripod of a telescope, considering factors such as sturdiness, smoothness, and accuracy in a 1 to 5-star rating system, with a 5-star rating signifying a well-constructed mount that moves smoothly, minimizing vibrations when focusing.
  5. Apart from the overall rating, we evaluate several other components such as lunar and planetary views, rich field views, accessories, ease of use, portability, and value to provide a complete picture of a telescope's capabilities and suitability for the user.
  6. We provide individual ratings for each crucial component, enabling beginners to make informed decisions by taking advantage of our thorough testing and unbiased appraisals, especially in areas like optics, where quality can be hard for them to assess.

Read also:

    Related

    Latest