AI models aren't obligated to cover content costs, asserts Trump
In the rapidly evolving world of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the United States is grappling with the question of whether training AI models on copyrighted works amounts to copyright infringement. The current regulations are in a state of flux, with ongoing debates and court rulings shaping the legal landscape.
The fair use doctrine plays a crucial role in determining the legality of using copyrighted materials to train AI models. Courts consider four factors: the transformative nature of the use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount and substantiality of the portion used, and the effect of the use on the potential market for the original work.
A landmark ruling in 2025 by a federal judge in California declared that training large language AI models on copyrighted books is legal under fair use if the materials are used for transformative purposes and do not harm the market for the original work. However, the ruling also stressed that AI platforms cannot use pirated materials for training.
The U.S. Copyright Office, in a report released in 2025, suggested that training AI models may be fair use in some situations but not others. The decision on a case-by-case basis is left to the courts.
However, there is no direct impact of Donald Trump's administration mentioned in the search results regarding the current regulations on copyright laws for AI models. The evolution of these regulations is driven more by recent court decisions and ongoing legal discussions rather than specific policy changes from any presidential administration.
During Trump's tenure, his decrees were aimed at removing barriers to the use and development of AI in the US. The American tech industry backed Trump, viewing him as a potential ally in overcoming regulatory hurdles. Trump's influence extended to regulatory matters, with the American tech industry considering him important due to his influence.
The goal, according to Trump, was to make the US the world leader in Artificial Intelligence. Key AI companies in the US include OpenAI (developers of ChatGPT), Microsoft, and Nvidia. Trump expressed his conviction that AI cannot succeed in the US if one has to pay for every article, book, or other material read or studied.
The Chinese startup DeepSeek poses a significant competition for these US companies. Last year, the American tech industry largely supported Trump, hoping for regulatory easement or elimination. Trump's decrees were also intended to promote the use of American AI models abroad.
As the legal landscape around AI and copyright continues to evolve, the role of AI in shaping our future is becoming increasingly significant. The debates and court rulings will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the tech industry and the way AI is developed and used in the US and beyond.
- In light of President Trump's decrees aiming to remove barriers in the use and development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), there is a growing expectation for a competitive landscape between US AI companies like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Nvidia, and Chinese startup DeepSeek.
- The ongoing debates and court rulings surrounding the legality of using copyrighted materials to train AI models, such as the 2025 federal ruling in California, are shaping the policy-and-legislation landscape, especially in terms of artificial-intelligence and general-news.
- To secure the US's position as the world leader in Artificial Intelligence, President Trump expressed his belief that it is crucial to minimize copyright costs associated with every article, book, or material used for AI training, highlighting the relationship between technology, politics, and economy in these discussions.
